Who it is for
Scope creep starts where the contract stopped being specific
Freelance disputes are rarely about whether the work was good. They are about whether the work was in scope. A signed agreement that says what is included, and what is not, is the cheapest insurance available, and paying a monthly subscription to send a handful of contracts a year never made sense.
Why a subscription is the wrong shape for this
Most freelancers send a few contracts a month at most. Per-user monthly pricing is built for teams that send constantly, so the per-document cost for a solo operator is genuinely bad.
Free with no document cap fits the actual usage pattern: quiet for weeks, then three contracts in a day when work lands.
What to get signed
- The statement of work, with deliverables and what is explicitly excluded
- Payment terms, including deposits and what happens on late payment
- Revision limits, the single most common source of scope arguments
- Rights and ownership on delivery
- Change orders, when the client asks for something outside the original scope
Getting paid is a separate problem
A signature does not collect money, and anyone who tells you otherwise is selling something. What it does is remove the ambiguity that lets a slow payer argue. When the terms are signed and timestamped, the conversation is about when rather than whether.
Common questions
- Do my clients need an account?
- No. They get a link, they sign, that is the whole experience for them.
- Can I reuse the same contract repeatedly?
- Yes. Send the same document as many times as you like, to as many clients as you like, at no cost.
- What do I get when it is done?
- A certified PDF with the audit trail and a verification code anyone can check.
More in who it is for
Free, and not the kind of free with a catch
Unlimited documents, unlimited signers, certified PDFs on every one. No trial clock and no card to start.
Start signing free